Excerpts from analyst's report

tanaitengDBS Vickers analyst: Tan Ai Teng (left)

Steady flow

» Profit boosted by much higher interest income, but core profit is slightly below our estimate at S$51m

» 9M14 EPC revenue beat estimate, but Treatment revenue fell short

» Dynamic industry outlook to continue to support performance; also seeking growth from acquisitions

» Maintain BUY, TP S$0.22

9M14 core profit is 70% of full year forecast

 3Q14 net profit grew 75% y-o-y to RM67m although revenue only grew 10% to RMB306m. Stripping out forex gain and one-off disposal gain, core profit was Rmb51m, a shade lower than our Rmb54m estimate. Gross margin fell to 26% from 33% in 2Q13 and 27% in 2Q14, mainly due to lower construction margins for some projects in the quarter.

dbs_forecasts11.14Source: Company, DBS Bank, Bloomberg Finance L.P.However, net margin improved to 22% from 14% in 3Q13 and 17% in 2Q14 due to much higher interest income (Rmb38m) as a result of late repayment of trade receivables.

Overall, 9M14 profit grew 31% y-o-y to RMB171m, accounting for 72% of our FY14 estimate. 9M14 EPC revenue beat estimate, but Treatment fell short

 YTD EPC revenue of Rmb370m (+62% y-o-y) is close to our full year forecast of Rmb386m despite the proposed sale of the business.

However, Treatment revenue of Rmb568m (+14% y-o-y) is only 56% of our full year forecast, implying lower treatment volume or utilisation rate.

Healthy balance sheet

 Net gearing ratio eased to 0.4x from 0.6x in 2Q14 and 1.2x in 3Q13.

Tweaked FY14F/15F earnings

 SIIC is poised to continue to register positive growth on the back of strong industry dynamics. However, we trimmed FY14F/15F earnings by one percent after pacing out revenue recognition and raising interest income. Maintain BUY rating and S$0.22 TP.


We used the sum-of-the-parts method to value SIIC, to capture the different earnings characteristics of the two businesses. Our target price is based on 12x PE for Construction, and 10-Year Discounted Cash Flow valuation for Water Treatment assuming 8% Weighted Average Cost of Capital, zero terminal growth, and flat tariff rates throughout the concession period.

Accounts receivable risks 

 Highly sensitive to fluctuations in accounts receivables.  

Rising interest rate 
 Rising borrowing costs would be a risk since 60-65% of project investment costs are debt-funded.   

Project delay 
 Delays in development of projects.  

You may also be interested in:

You have no rights to post comments

Counter NameLastChange
AEM Holdings3.3600.030
Avi-Tech Electronics0.255-
Best World1.640-
Broadway Ind0.076-0.002
China Sunsine0.400-0.010
Delfi Limited1.260-
Food Empire1.1200.030
Fortress Minerals0.325-0.010
Geo Energy Res0.250-0.005
GSS Energy0.033-0.001
Hong Leong Finance2.460-0.030
Hongkong Land (USD)3.4600.040
ISDN Holdings0.375-
IX Biopharma0.045-
Jiutian Chemical0.032-
KSH Holdings0.320-
Leader Env0.072-0.001
Medtecs Intl0.139-0.005
Nordic Group0.415-
Oxley Holdings0.106-0.001
REX International0.183-0.007
Sinostar PEC0.140-
Southern Alliance Mining0.690-
Straco Corp.0.4550.010
Sunpower Group0.295-
The Trendlines0.095-
Totm Technologies0.048-0.001
Uni-Asia Group0.950-
Wilmar Intl3.7400.040
Yangzijiang Shipbldg1.660-0.050

We have 1301 guests and no members online

rss_2 NextInsight - Latest News