| Excerpts from analyst reports…..
Analysts: Jinsong Du & Ronney Cheung ● While many fear an upcoming de-rating for the sector, we remain confident because: 1) public housing’s impact should be minimal; 2) urbanisation rate was overestimated; and 3) government measures should accelerate industry consolidation. ● We still believe that the diversified players with high asset turns, such as China Vanke and COLI, have less near-term risks and better long-term potential. Those with high gearing, such as R&F and Greentown, could suffer from balance sheet squeeze. For the second time in a week, Vice Premier Li Keqiang hosted a government meeting on public housing on 21 August. He emphasized that governments should implement more measures to increase near-term supply of commodity housing (i.e., private housing). We believe this means it is certain that many more cities (including Beijing) will implement controls on developers’ presales proceeds. If all measures are strictly implemented (i.e., construction loan control, pre-sales proceeds control, and stop land hoarding), increasing asset turns would be the only way for developers to get the cash inflow they need. significantly – for example, Beijing may implement those measures more vigorously than other cities. The sector should not de-rate – public housing not a threat; urbanisation and industry consolidation to sustain the growth. Vice Premier Li also emphasised rental housing. This further confirms our 14 June 2010 report's analysis that rental housing should become the main focus for China’s public housing development going forward. We believe this means that public housing in China will be similar to that in Hong Kong – it should help solve low-income class’ housing needs, but have minimal impact on the private housing markets over the long term. While some believe China’s real urbanisation rate far exceeds the official 47%, we believe it should be much lower than 47% – at least 30% of the 600 mn city dwellers enjoy little urban benefits. We expect the future urbanisation to switch from the ‘expansionary’ mode of merely increasing urban areas to the ‘inclusive’ mode of increasing the penetration of public welfare, and thus boost ‘real’ urbanisation. We also expect the government measures to have a positive long-term impact by accelerating property sector consolidation.
|
Most Popular >>
- GLOBAL PREMIUM HOTELS IPO: Insights into room pricing
- JEL (15-bagger stock): Look out for significant M&A event(s)
- ERATAT AGM: Good turnout, pertinent (but familiar) questions asked
- YANGZIJIANG: Celebrates 5 stellar years of growth on Singapore bourse
- CHINA FIBRETECH: "Ridiculous that the market is pricing it at less than 4 cents"
- ROXY-PACIFIC chalks up another $150 m sales, ASL Marine target is 83 cents
- BUFFETT Says China May Already Have Its Coke
- MIDAS: Will its train recover speed fast next year?
Your Say >>
- Re:Why i increase my cash holdings
- Re:Healthway Medical
- Re: HIAP HOE
- Re:China Animal
- Re:China Animal -- the time has come?
- MIDAS HOLDINGS -- dbs says buy!
- Re:why china minzhong
- Crying Game in biggest S-Chip market
- China Minzhong
- Re:Re:Re:Re:Qingmei
- Re:Re:Re:Qingmei
- Re:Re:Qingmei
- Re:HIAP HOE
- Re:Qingmei
- Re:Juken
- Re:Re:Re:why china minzhong drop until 69 cts?
- Re:Re:Re:Qingmei
- Re:Juken warrants -- be careful of commisison cost
- Re:Juken
- Juken: 14% gain for holding for 4 months
- Re:Re:Qingmei
- Re:Re:Re:why china minzhong drop until 69 cts?
- Re:Re:Re:why china minzhong drop until 69 cts?
- Re:Re:why china minzhong drop until 69 cts?
- Re:why china minzhong drop until 69 cts?









